And when you use your authority and power as a billion-dollar media platform making judgments on what's true vs false - if that's not censorship what is it?

Or is the answer you're looking for - if it supports your political worldview, then it's reasonable content moderation, but if it's against your political worldview, then only at that point it's censorship?

The world would be a better place if we all made subjective judgments like this and maybe consider what it's like to be on the side of the silenced.